ATTN: Generals64 Group Members

Wileymorgan Chat At Intel4u Tuesday Morning …..8/19/2014

[wileymorgan] “It is better to be hated for what you are than to be loved for what you are not.” ~ André Gide

[wileymorgan] much talk from many about things they have never been made apart of the internal workings. This is your group we have done our level best for all involved to make it as simple as possible.

[wileymorgan] it seems prevelant in our society anymore to tear things down we do not understand or do not like.

[wileymorgan] yes, there are many nay sayers, but were we to stop and care about them wanting us to stay at thier level then non of what has been done could have been accomplished

[wileymorgan] all dinar is sanctioned by UST, people are being disingenious with thier parsing of words and thier truths

[jamajacks] wileymorgan Secondly, it was said last night in Jesters place that the exchange time frame may only be for 30 days, and that will be in Iraq only, unless you are a part of a UST sanctioned group.
[wileymorgan] jamajacks let Jester worry about his group, for he has never been apart of ours

[jamajacks] wileymorgan I appreciate your response very much, as I have recieved a number of calls this morning about it.
[wileymorgan] jamajacks refer them to Jesters room for explanation, it was not your info to have to explain

[HIGHERGROUND] wileymorgan Hi there and a sincere thank you for all you and the G64 leaders have done for all of us. I am sincerely grateful especially considering the misdirection and disinformation these last days… Blessings on you!!

[wileymorgan] no ones agenda matters but your own.

[wileymorgan] your plan is just that yours, what works for you will not work for everyone.
[jamajacks] wileymorgan You are correct sir, I will take that and turn the other cheek. I have always appreciated all you and the others have done and continue to do.TY again.

[HIGHERGROUND] wileymorgan completely agree… but the concern of many has been all the vairous options that may be available… no 800 .. yes 800…. groups that have ulterior motives.. certain individuals claiming time frames on CE and the list goes on… I personally believe in my heart that the only way…..
[HIGHERGROUND] is for me to go with my “gut” feeling … and that is a the G64 because it has not been caught up in the drama of dinar land and calling it every day…. or week…

[wileymorgan] thier is no point to come on daily and brow beat people, either you are interested in what the group has done or one is not. Only thing you had to give was an email. Seems pretty simple to me. If you do not like what is presented you are free to go someplace else.
[HIGHERGROUND] wileymorgan yes sir and amen!!!

[wileymorgan] why this creates so much drama is beyond me. If one does not like the group..turn the page and move on!

[Grandpa10] wileymorgan this is dinarland, from time to time you have said the same thing to calm the masses, pete and repete, Thank You..
[wileymorgan] Grandpa10 we care not for a pedastal from which to stand and speak. We wanted an equitable exchange for all and nothing more.

[BLESSME] Wiley how is our friend doing in rehab?
[wileymorgan] BLESSME they are getting better everyday

[Lvn42day] wileymorgan May I ask please, will there be different 800 numbers for different groups?
[wileymorgan] Lvn42day the only thing you need concern yourself with is the number for the group you are in
[Lvn42day] wileymorgan And that will come from KCmanna, right? Thank you.
[wileymorgan] Lvn42day bank signed by Kcmana
[Lvn42day] wileymorgan Thank you, have a glorious day!

Posted in 2014, Iraq, Money, USA | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

My prediction about Facebook came true

Light Worker 29501:

Two years ago, I wrote about the origins of Facebook. The company had gone public with its IPO, which was tanking badly.

Here are key excerpts from the article:

“But now the Facebook stock has tanked. On Friday, August 17, [2012] it weighed in at half its initial IPO price. For the first time since the IPO, venture-capital backers were legally permitted to sell off their shares, and some did, at a loss.”

“This has the earmarks of a classic shakeout and squeeze play…First, they [insiders] drive down the price of the stock, then they trade it at low levels that discourage and demoralize the public and even semi-insiders. As the stock continues to tank, they quietly buy up as much of it as they can. Finally, when the price hits a designated rock bottom, they shoot it up all the way to new highs and win big.”

***“The company is too important as a data-mining asset of the intelligence community to let it fall into disrepair and chaos.”

“The media will play along, pretending the eventual upswing-recovery of Facebook stock happens for fundamental reasons connected to the company’s ‘better level of performance’. The media take this approach to every stock and every company, to avoid letting the public know how massive manipulation actually runs these trading markets.”

Originally posted on Jon Rappoport's Blog:

My prediction about Facebook came true

by Jon Rappoport

August 19, 2014

Two years ago, I wrote about the origins of Facebook. The company had gone public with its IPO, which was tanking badly.

Here are key excerpts from the article:

“But now the Facebook stock has tanked. On Friday, August 17, [2012] it weighed in at half its initial IPO price. For the first time since the IPO, venture-capital backers were legally permitted to sell off their shares, and some did, at a loss.”

“This has the earmarks of a classic shakeout and squeeze play…First, they [insiders] drive down the price of the stock, then they trade it at low levels that discourage and demoralize the public and even semi-insiders. As the stock continues to tank, they quietly buy up as much of it as they can. Finally, when the price hits a designated rock bottom, they shoot…

View original 440 more words

Posted in Light Worker 29501 | Leave a comment

Every television newscast is staged reality

Light Worker 29501:

This is why I haven’t had a TV for over seven years…

Originally posted on Jon Rappoport's Blog:

Every television newscast is staged reality

by Jon Rappoport

August 18, 2014

Focus on the network evening news. This is where the staging is done well.

First, we have the image itself, the colors in foreground and background, the blend of restful and charged hues. The anchor and his/her smooth style.

Then we have the shifting of venue from the studio to reporters in the field, demonstrating the reach of coverage: the planet. As if this equals authenticity.

Actually, those reporters in the field rarely dig up information on location. A correspondent standing on a rooftop in Cairo could just as well be positioned in a bathroom in a Las Vegas McDonald’s. His report would be identical.

The managing editor, usually the elite news anchor, chooses the stories to cover and has the final word on their sequence.

The anchor goes on the air: “Our top story tonight, more…

View original 1,666 more words

Posted in Light Worker 29501 | Leave a comment

Bank With BRICS

Celebrations surrounding the 70th anniversary of the Bretton Woods agreements that created the IMF and the World Bank are low key affairs. It does not help that the U.S. Congress has failed to ratify the most recent agreement to expand the IMF, required to make World Bank resources (tied to IMF borrowing quotas) grow as well.

Transcripts of the 1944 conference held at the Mount Washington Hotel in New Hampshire have been discovered and published. Observers have long recognized the significance of what transpired when the American delegation led by Harry White debated the British delegation led by John Maynard Keynes. New work by Canadian political economist Eric Heilleiner shows that the conference organized by the wartime allies (the United Nations before the UN was created) had a wider focus than was commonly understood, and included significant contributions from more than the U.S. and U.K.

Undoubtedly, the first step in establishing postwar U.S. hegemonic leadership was the scuttling of the Keynes plan at Bretton Woods. A banking arrangement Keynes called an international clearings union where countries with international surpluses would automatically lend them to deficit countries — the U.S. would have been the lender — was opposed by the U.S. and its allies.

As it turned out, in the years after the war, the U.S. provided bilaterally over $12 billion in Marshall Plan loans to Europe, far more in dollars than was envisaged by the Keynes plan.

As a result of Bretton Woods, a U.S. dollar based foreign exchange market system emerged. Individuals and companies would trade their national currencies for U.S. dollars, and then use their dollars to make international payments. It was not until 1958 that the European countries accepted to make their currencies convertible through foreign exchange markets, activating IMF lending.

The role of the World Bank was simple: sell bonds on Wall St. to absorb the surplus funds accumulating in the U.S. banking system; then lend the money to Europe for rebuilding infrastructure damaged during the war. If American firms got many of the building contracts so much the better.

At about the same time as the 70th anniversary of Bretton Woods, the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) were putting the finishing touches on two new international financial institutions they decided to create just over one year ago.
The New Development Bank conceived for infrastructure lending begins with capital pledges from the five founding members of $50 billion, increasing to $100 billion by 2017. A short-term lending facility, the Contigency Reserve Arrangement to fend off speculative attacks against the BRICS from hedge funds, shadow banks, and others is also to come into existence. This will be a welcome development for Russia facing G7 country boycotts instigated to limit its access to financial markets.

By 2014 the U.S. had been running huge deficits in international accounts for over three decades. Other nations have been accumulating dollars in foreign exchange reserves. China is the champion with an accumulated surplus of over $3 trillion !
China has already been putting its excess dollars to work around the world, lending for infrastructure projects at attractive rates (priced below market rates) through its state owned banks. Chinese companies follow the loans building dams, roads, railroads, ports, and football stadiums in Africa, Latin America, Asia, or Europe.

The New Development Bank is now set up to do what the World Bank has failed to do: borrow Chinese surpluses and lend to deficit countries other than the U.S. for infrastructure.The financial power of the BRICS Bank resides in its ability to use its paid-in and callable capital as security to borrow on world markets. A New Development Bank bond will be considered “risk free” by financial markets because the resources of the BRICS countries lie behind the pledge to pay interest, and redeem the bond at maturity.

The BRICS Bank founding documents only mention dollars (and establish English as the working language). The Bank could also issue bonds denominated in Special Drawing Rights, the international currency unit of the IMF; or indeed in the Chinese currency unit; or create an international unit of its own. Needless to say currency decisions made by its Board of Governors, Directors, and President will be watched closely around the world.

The Bank and the Contingency Reserve Arrangement both provide for additional members to join. Given the unwillingness of the U.S. Congress to implement decisions made by the G20 to expand IMF and World Bank resources, it would make sense for Canada along with other middle power countries to consider membership in the new institutions. Moving away from an international system where the richest country in the world, the U.S., is also the biggest borrower from the rest of the world is an objective worth pursuing outside the IMF and World Bank.

Duncan Cameron is the president of and writes a weekly column on politics and current affairs.


Posted in 2014, Banking, Global, Government / Politics, USA | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Here’s How the Loan Scam Works

(And why you should NEVER feel sorry for Banks and so on)

(As simplified as I can make it, based on the work of Robert-Arthur: Menard, Mary-Elizabeth: Croft and (to some extent Winston Shrout and Irene-Maus: Gravenhorst), and John R. Dempsey of Sovereign Trust. I’ve just tried to reduce it to absolute fundamentals)

1) Banks: They take deposits. These are held in trust for the depositor. They must, by law, always be prepared to return any and all deposits back to depositors on demand. That’s the LAW. They would not be able to do that if they were ever to lend out any money on deposit to anyone requesting a loan. They cannot, therefore, lend or invest anything entrusted to them. So the question is: Where do they get the money from, in order to loan it to you?

2) Loan Companies, Credit Card Companies, Building Societies: They don’t take deposit money anyway (I’m talking about the ‘older version’ of Building Societies before they became banks. I’m referring to the way they would just issue mortgages. Their ‘banking’ activities are controlled as in (1), above). So the question is: Where do they get the money from, in order to loan it to you as a mortgage?

Leave that question pending for a moment.

3) What is a cheque? Paper, printing ink, somewhere you can hand-write a Payee, and Amount (in numbers and words), a Date, and somewhere to write your signature.

4) What is a Loan Application/Agreement? Paper, printing ink, somewhere a Payee will be written (the name of the Loan Company), somewhere for an Amount (in numbers and words), a Date, and somewhere to write your signature.

Do you see any similarity between (3) & (4)?

A Loan Agreement is a cheque. (Cheques can be written on anything … even toilet paper … provided it contains the essential information so as to enable correct clearance processing)

You send off the Loan Agreement to the Loan Company … and they CASH YOUR CHEQUE! They cash it with an organisation that has the power to issue ‘money’ for that purpose (for example the Treasury, or the Bank of England, etc)


Simple. Wasn’t it?

But wait! Sure, they provided the ‘service’ of converting your cheque into funds within an account you can drawn upon (write other cheques against, use a Credit Card against, etc). And they could do that because they knew how to do that. And yes, that was a service. And yes, they should be paid a fee for that service.

But wait again! What is their ‘fee’? Their ‘servicing fee’?


That’s all they ask for .. in order to provide the original service!

How to do they ensure they collect this ‘service fee’. By giving you a Payment Book! And they make sure they cream off the INTEREST, before applying the remainder as PAYMENT. In fact they even cajole you into never-ending INTEREST by specifying a minimum payment equal to the INTEREST they want. (Knowing full well you’ll often opt for that, thereby allowing them to roll the whole thing on endlessly)

Now let’s view this another way.

If you write a cheque for £100, and send it to someone else (the Payee), and they cash it – DO YOU EXPECT THE BANK TO DEDUCT ANOTHER £100 PLUS INTEREST – FOR ITSELF – AS WELL?

No? You don’t when you write a cheque you ‘see’ as a cheque do you?

Well, then, why should they do that just because you can’t ‘see’ a Loan Agreement as the cheque it actually is?





Your ‘promise to pay’ creates money. Yours, and everyone else’s.



So what -should- happen, then?


What should happen is that you write out a cheque – promising to pay – and send it to the Treasury yourself. They would then ‘cash’ it (in the same way they do that for a Bank), by updating an account with the amount you specified, from which you can draw funds as you need them.


That’s it. Your ‘promise to pay’ stands until the end of time. That’s all money is. A ‘promise to pay’, which stands until the end of time.


All money. “All thee bits of it”.


Check out a Banknote. What does it say? “I promise to pay the Bearer on demand the sum of so-many-pounds”. And signed by the Governor of the Bank of England (in the UK). A banknote is a Promissory Note – just like a cheque or Loan Agreement or any other IOU. An IOU that stands until the end of time.


What should a Bank do? It should simply accept the ‘cash’ from the Treasury, and operate the account for you.


And claim a reasonable – SMALL – fee for providing you with this convenience.


If you agree to some of your funds being invested, the bank should deduct their fees as commission, and not bother you with any other ‘charges’ at all.


THIS IS WHERE WE NEED TO GET TO. To be able to convert your SIGNATURE directly, without any Bank or Loan Company intervening.



And now for something completely different


When you sent them your cheque (aka Loan Agreement) and they cashed it, they could have just walked away with your money. If they’d done that, you wouldn’t have known any difference.


They could have just written to you and said “Sorry, we didn’t approve this loan, after all”


You would have been miffed at not getting the loan but, on the other hand, slightly relieved you didn’t have the payments hanging over you, believing that the whole thing was ‘dead’.


Dead? They were ‘up’ by the amount of the loan! And you were empty-handed! And you had given them that amount!


Dead? I should cocoa!


No. They are greedy, greedy, greedy, greedy. They want INTEREST. Never-ending INTEREST. They POSITIVELY HATE IT when you pay off a loan. Have you noticed? Try getting a loan, and then paying it back immediately. TRY IT.


No. They can lend you your own money, and then claim it back PLUS INTEREST, if they don’t just walk away.


That’s why they don’t just walk away.


Every loan taken out generates money for them. Generated by your payments back.


That’s where banks (etc.) get their money from. All they need to do is to make as sure as possible you’ve fallen for this SCAM sufficient times in the past, so as to be pretty sure you’ll fall for it again.


If you ‘default’ on payments, they had ALREADY BEEN PAID IN FULL RIGHT AT THE START. They took the risk with it. Exactly the same risk as when they invest anywhere. If prices go down, they simply lose, write off the experience, and try elsewhere. Do they send bailiffs if ‘prices go down’? Err … no.


They ‘involve’ themselves when (as explained above) they have no need to be. The risks of doing so are, therefore, entirely theirs, and consequently there is absolutely no need to feel sorry for them.


YOU, on the other hand, don’t owe ANYTHING to ANYONE.


What YOU did was to ‘make some money’ – and then spend it the way you wanted to spend it.


And why not? ‘Money was made’ by you SIGNING a cheque and thereby ‘promising to pay’. I repeat, that’s the only way ‘money is ever made’.


They were the ones who jammed their oar into that simple mechanism.



And now for something that gets really silly


Mortgages. The method for obtaining the cash amount is the same as described above. But there is more to mortgages that meet the eye. (More, over and above, straight loans).


Here a property, in the form of a dwelling, is being transferred from one owner to another (actually one keeper to another, not owner, but that’s another subject).


Now, it is illegal to mortgage a property you don’t own. The property is considered to be the security on the loan. How can you be providing ‘security’ when you don’t – at that time – actually own the thing?


And, secondly, it is illegal to transfer a property/dwelling that has not yet been paid for.


So … what does this mean? You can’t establish a loan, because you don’t have any security to offer. Therefore you can’t pay for it, because you can’t get the loan money. (Err … no. You can’t offer you current home as security, because you are probably in the process of selling it!) And, since you can’t pay for it, the Seller can’t transfer it into your name.


But … on the other hand … people can and do establish mortgages, do buy homes, and do move house.


How is this done?


Well … it happens by ‘magic’. The Bank/Building Society uses ‘magic’.


Not really paranormal ‘magic’, of course … more akin to fraud, in actual fact.


John Dempsey, of Sovereign Trust, explains in absolute detail how the Magic Bank operates.


(Sovereign Trust, btw, don’t employ any form of magic/fraud. They do it honestly, openly, candidly, and all above board)




Veronica: of the Chapman family

(January, 2009)


Posted in Banking, Money | Tagged , , , , , , ,

The Confidential Memo at the Heart of the Global Financial Crisis | VICE United Kingdom

When a little birdie dropped the End Game memo through my window, its content was so explosive, so sick and plain evil, I just couldn’t believe it.

The Memo confirmed every conspiracy freak’s fantasy: that in the late 1990s, the top US Treasury officials secretly conspired with a small cabal of banker big-shots to rip apart financial regulation across the planet. When you see 26.3 percent unemployment in Spain, desperation and hunger in Greece, riots in Indonesia and Detroit in bankruptcy, go back to this End Game memo, the genesis of the blood and tears.

The Treasury official playing the bankers’ secret End Game was Larry Summers. Today, Summers is Barack Obama’s leading choice for Chairman of the US Federal Reserve, the world’s central bank. If the confidential memo is authentic, then Summers shouldn’t be serving on the Fed, he should be serving hard time in some dungeon reserved for the criminally insane of the finance world.

The memo is authentic.

Full story.

Posted in Banking, Global, Government / Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Iraqi PM Resigns. Nouri Al-Maliki Resigns As PM Of Iraq. al-Maliki to back new PM

Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has agreed to step aside and support his nominated replacement in the post, Shiite lawmakers told The Associated Press on Thursday. If al-Maliki follows through, the move would end a political deadlock that plunged Baghdad into uncertainty as the country fights a Sunni militant
The government announced that al-Maliki would deliver a nationally televised address Thursday evening, without elaborating.
Al-Maliki has been struggling for weeks to stay for a third four-year term as prime minister amid an attempt by opponents to push him out, accusing him of monopolizing power and pursuing a fiercely pro-Shiite agenda that has alienated the Sunni minority.

The pressure intensified this week when his Shiite political alliance backed another member of his party, Haider al-Abadi, to replace him, and President Fouad Massoum nominated al-Abadi to form the next government. Al-Maliki for days has refused to step aside, saying the nomination violates the constitution.

But in a meeting of his Dawa party on Thursday evening, al-Maliki agreed to endorse al-Abadi as the next prime minister, two senior lawmakers from his State of Law parliamentary bloc – Hussein al-Maliki and Khalaf Abdul-Samad – told the AP. They and two other Shiite lawmakers said al-Maliki would announce his endorse in his speech Thursday night. The two other lawmakers spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the closed-door meeting.

The lawmakers said al-Maliki also agreed to drop a suit before the constitutional court challenging al-Abadi’s nomination.

Al-Maliki had grown increasingly isolated as not only erstwhile Shiite allies but also top ally Iran, the United States and the U.N. backed al-Abadi, who has 30-days to put together a Cabinet for parliament’s approval.

The U.N. Security Council urged al-Abadi to work swiftly to form “an inclusive government that represents all segments of the Iraqi population and that contributes to finding a viable and sustainable solution to the country’s current challenges.”

The U.S. and other countries have been pushing for an inclusive government that will ease anger among Sunnis, who felt marginalized by al-Maliki’s administration, helping fuel the dramatic sweep by the Islamic State extremist group over much of northern and western Iraq since June.

The extremist Islamic State group’s lightning advance across much of northern and western Iraq has driven hundreds of thousands of people from their homes since June, and last week prompted the U.S. to launch aid operations and airstrikes as the militants threatened religious minorities and the largely autonomous Kurdish region.

Posted in 2014, Government / Politics, Iraq | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Generals64 Dinar Chat from May 31, 2014

For Dinarians out there (especially members of the Generals64/Studley group), it seems that the group is still in “lock-down”. In addition, the domain name for the group’s web-site is now up for sale. This could be a good sign, but I won’t speculate.

The Generals64/Studley group was adamant about not spreading gossip, and advising people to stay out of the chat rooms. When I first learned about the Dinar revaluation (RV), I belonged to a few chat groups, and rode the emotional roller coaster for a few months. Then the One People’s Public Trust came along, followed by Bitcoin.

I’ve had a real education in how banking and government really work, and been exposed to a lot of people and great ideas.

I think the only time we’ve heard anything from Generals64 this year was on May 31st, when he uncharacteristically came online. After reading the transcipt of the chat, a several things jump out at me, as follows:

  1. Nobody knows what the exchange rate will be
  2. The tax implications of this event are unclear
  3. This is a currency exchange, as opposed to the selling-off of an investment
  4. We’ve been told the price of gold and silver will drop significantly before this happens
  5. There is no mention of Iraqi politics being a barrier
  6. Keep an eye on prices on the various dinar trader web-sites
  7. Banks that know anything aren’t going to tell dinar “gurus”
  8. Whether or not a non-disclosure agreement will be required remains to be seen
  9. Dinar groups will probably exchange before the general public
  10. The average Dinarian holds 100,000 Dinar
  11. Back in the 1930s, the Dinar was worth over $4.00 USD
  12. The Kuwait Dinar is valued at about $3.50 USD

Full Transcript.

Posted in Iraq, Money | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Changes in Spot Price for Precious Metals


Today marked the last day of using a 117-year old system for fixing the price of silver. Rather than let it free-float, the legalized corruption will likely continue under a new name. Tomorrow is supposed to be the first day of using the new CME/Thomson Reuters system, but nobody has said they’re using it.

The Beginning of the End
The (New) London Silver Price

Posted in Money | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Tribute to Robin Williams

Thanks, BP!

Posted in 2014 | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment